Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MLSS · against 31 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #20 of 32 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 38
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including MLSS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MLSS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 26 reported | 0.18× | 0.17× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 1.07 | 0.72 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 33 reported | 1.85× | 2.69× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 96 | 48 | |
| 2 | 31M USD | 91 | ||
| 3 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 83 | 48 | |
| 4 | 22M USD | 81 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2.8B JPY (≈$19M) | 78 | ||
| 16 | 25M GBP (≈$33M) | 44 | 31 | |
| 17 | 211M MYR (≈$46M) | 44 | 65 | |
| 18 | 64.3B KRW (≈$46M) | 43 | 24 | |
| 19 | 34M USD | 42 | 19 | |
| 20 | 27M USD | 38 | 24 | |
| 21 | 3.5B JPY (≈$24M) | 38 | 48 | |
| 22 | 272M HKD (≈$35M) | 35 | 59 | |
| 23 | 190M ILS (≈$51M) | 29 | ||
| 24 | 17M USD | 28 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score