Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EYPT · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #803 of 1,373 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including EYPT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EYPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.13× | 0.24× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.68 | 0.53 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 4.50× | 2.62× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 799 | 148M AUD (≈$98M) | 42 | 39 | |
| 800 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 19.2B INR (≈$231M) |
| 42 |
| 64 |
| 801 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 42 | 41 |
| 802 | 23.0B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 42 | 64 |
| 803 | 34M USD | 42 | 19 |
| 804 | 2.4B HKD (≈$310M) | 41 | 52 |
| 805 | 9.0B USD | 41 | 57 |
| 806 | 5.0B THB (≈$141M) | 41 | 63 |
| 807 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 41 | 16 |