Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Miller Industries, Inc.
How Miller Industries, Inc. stacks up
MLR · against 635 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #351 of 636 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score79 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including MLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 67% of peers. Operating margin: 4.0% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 2.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.4% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 609 reported | 7.4% | 6.3% | 56% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 635 reported | 4.0% | 5.7% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 601 reported | 2.4% | 2.6% | 47% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 589 reported | 3.4% | 5.9% | 38% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 637 reported | 14.7% | 29.0% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 351 | 135.1B JPY (≈$918M) | 39 | 53 | |
| 351 | 97.2B JPY (≈$661M) | 39 | 55 | |
| 351 | 39.3B TRY (≈$1.2B) | 39 | 55 | |
| 351 | 13.9B THB (≈$389M) | 39 | 42 | |
| 351 | 593M USD | 39 | 40 | |
| 351 | 325M EUR (≈$358M) | 39 | 43 | |
| 359 | 4.8B CNY (≈$676M) | 38 | 43 | |
| 359 | 1.60T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 38 | ||
| 359 | 1.3B SAR (≈$353M) | 38 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score