Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
How Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited stacks up
MLCO · against 450 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #60 of 451 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score59 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including MLCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | 14.0% | 5.4% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 460 reported | 14.9% | 9.6% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | -102.4% | 54.7% | 0% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 60 | 184.7B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 65 | |
| 60 | 188.3B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 63 | |
| 60 | 760M EUR (≈$836M) | 85 | 66 | |
| 60 | 2.5B USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 60 | 1.6B USD | 85 | 63 | |
| 60 | 4.7B BRL (≈$855M) | 85 | 57 | |
| 66 | 21.8B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 84 | 51 | |
| 66 | 18.1B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 84 | 54 | |
| 66 | 6.7B CNY (≈$935M) | 84 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score