Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
How Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited stacks up
MLCO · against 462 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #208 of 463 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score71 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including MLCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 65% of peers. Return on invested capital: 10.6% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 74% of peers. Operating margin: 11.6% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 439 reported | 10.6% | 8.7% | 61% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 463 reported | 11.6% | 7.5% | 72% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 439 reported | 2.4% | 3.7% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 429 reported | Not reported | 9.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 465 reported | 38.2% | 31.1% | 63% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 208 | 137.0B JPY (≈$932M) | 59 | 73 | |
| 208 | 947M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 59 | 59 | |
| 208 | 1.9B GBP (≈$2.5B) | 59 | 55 | |
| 208 | 161.1B INR (≈$1.9B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 208 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 208 | 17.7B ZAR (≈$972M) | 59 | 61 | |
| 208 | 726M EUR (≈$799M) | 59 | 39 | |
| 208 | 906M USD | 59 | 80 | |
| 208 | 147.5B INR (≈$1.8B) | 59 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score