Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MLAB · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #989 of 1,698 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including MLAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MLAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.85× | 0.26× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.05 | 0.84 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.79× | 1.83× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 985 | 5.9B CNY (≈$828M) | 42 | 15 | |
| 986 | 90.9B TWD (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 59 | |
| 987 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 988 | 15.1B TWD (≈$467M) | 42 | 52 | |
| 989 | 702M USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 990 | 3.5B SEK (≈$345M) | 42 | 62 | |
| 991 | 410.6B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 42 | 61 | |
| 992 | 521M MYR (≈$115M) | 42 | 42 | |
| 993 | 2.7B USD | 42 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score