Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MKC · against 91 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #67 of 92 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MKC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MKC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 91 reported | 0.66× | 0.62× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 89 reported | 0.64 | 0.33 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 85 reported | 0.66× | 1.31× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 2 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 4 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 83 | 57 | |
| 5 | 118.9B CNY (≈$16.7B) | 83 | 61 | |
| 63 | 18.2B USD | 23 | 43 | |
| 64 | 7.6B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 65 | 79.1B NOK (≈$7.5B) | 22 | 38 | |
| 66 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 43 | |
| 67 | 12.9B USD | 21 | 62 | |
| 68 | 25.2B USD | 21 | 65 | |
| 69 | 21.1B EUR (≈$23.2B) | 20 | 54 | |
| 70 | 291.8B MXN (≈$15.8B) | 20 | 49 | |
| 71 | 392.1B THB (≈$11.0B) | 19 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score