Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MKC · against 152 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #95 of 153 · scores higher than 38% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)26 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MKC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MKC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 144 reported | 0.66× | 0.74× | 55% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 138 reported | 0.64 | 0.56 | 42% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 153 reported | 0.66× | 1.43× | 5% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 3 | 400M USD | 94 | 34 | |
| 4 | 607M USD | 93 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 93 | 33 | |
| 91 | 18.2B USD | 23 | 43 | |
| 92 | 1.2B USD | 22 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 93 | 7.6B USD | 22 | 45 |
| 94 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 43 |
| 95 | 12.9B USD | 21 | 62 |
| 96 | 430M USD | 21 | 32 |
| 97 | 1.7B USD | 21 | 42 |
| 98 | 25.2B USD | 21 | 65 |
| 99 | 47.3B USD | 21 | 47 |