Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MITK · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #545 of 1,698 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 68
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including MITK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MITK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.22× | 0.26× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.94 | 0.84 | 43% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.74× | 1.83× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 541 | 15.9B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 68 | 54 | |
| 542 | 4.5B CNY (≈$627M) | 68 | 32 | |
| 543 | 22.0B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 68 | 47 | |
| 544 | 18.1B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 68 | 59 | |
| 545 | 818M USD | 68 | 65 | |
| 546 | 910.0B JPY (≈$6.2B) | 68 | 68 | |
| 547 | 60.8B TWD (≈$1.9B) | 68 | 67 | |
| 548 | 3.3B CNY (≈$458M) | 68 | 40 | |
| 549 | 1.4B USD | 68 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score