Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MITK · against 599 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #220 of 600 · scores higher than 63% of peers · safety percentile 68
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)69 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including MITK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MITK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 571 reported | 0.22× | 0.22× | 49% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 574 reported | 0.94 | 0.67 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 597 reported | 2.74× | 1.83× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 5 | 3.8B CNY (≈$530M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 216 | 72.6B JPY (≈$493M) | 68 | 60 | |
| 217 | 4.6B CNY (≈$644M) | 68 | 37 | |
| 218 | 131.1B JPY (≈$892M) | 68 | 84 | |
| 219 | 4.5B CNY (≈$627M) | 68 | 32 | |
| 220 | 818M USD | 68 | 65 | |
| 221 | 3.3B CNY (≈$458M) | 68 | 40 | |
| 222 | 1.4B USD | 68 | 35 | |
| 223 | 732M AUD (≈$483M) | 68 | 66 | |
| 224 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score