Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mohawk Industries, Inc.
How Mohawk Industries, Inc. stacks up
MHK · against 182 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
70/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #36 of 183 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including MHK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.4% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MHK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MHK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 180 reported | 5.2% | 5.0% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 186 reported | 14.4% | 8.6% | 85% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 100 reported | 8.2% | 5.7% | 77% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 181 reported | 97.1% | 32.1% | 86% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MHK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 34 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 73 | 78 | |
| 34 | 8.6B USD | 73 | 55 | |
| 36 | 6.7B USD | 70 | 65 | |
| 36 | 19.7B USD | 70 | 62 | |
| 36 | 9.8B USD | 70 | 47 | |
| 36 | 62.0B DKK (≈$9.3B) | 70 | 55 | |
| 40 | 8.6B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 40 | 10.9B USD | 69 | 47 | |
| 40 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 69 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score