Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
How Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation stacks up
MGY · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #161 of 386 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MGY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -10.8% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.4% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MGY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MGY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 11.4% | 0.5% | 72% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -10.8% | 1.0% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 1.4% | -1.3% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MGY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 157 | 7.40T CLP (≈$8.1B) | 59 | 43 | |
| 157 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 77 | |
| 161 | 1.0B USD | 58 | 24 | |
| 161 | 3.8B USD | 58 | 21 | |
| 161 | 6.8B USD | 58 | 70 | |
| 161 | 4.6B CAD (≈$3.4B) | 58 | 63 | |
| 165 | 52.4B USD | 57 | 47 | |
| 165 | 2.51T INR (≈$30.2B) | 57 | 76 | |
| 165 | 173.5B USD | 57 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score