Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
How Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation stacks up
MGY · against 105 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #56 of 106 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MGY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -10.8% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.4% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MGY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MGY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 107 reported | 11.4% | 2.4% | 68% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 90 reported | -10.8% | 2.6% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 105 reported | 1.4% | 0.7% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MGY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 5.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 53 | 5.8B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 60 | 43 | |
| 54 | 7.40T CLP (≈$8.1B) | 59 | 43 | |
| 54 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 77 | |
| 56 | 3.8B USD | 58 | 21 | |
| 56 | 6.8B USD | 58 | 70 | |
| 58 | 8.2B CAD (≈$6.0B) | 57 | 49 | |
| 59 | 1.78T JPY (≈$12.1B) | 55 | 58 | |
| 60 | 87.1B CNY (≈$12.2B) | 54 | 66 | |
| 60 | 7.3B USD | 54 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score