Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGPI · against 261 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #228 of 262 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including MGPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | MGPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 252 reported | -66.2% | 4.5% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 267 reported | 12.6% | 9.3% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 0.2% | 5.3% | 26% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 255 reported | 162.3% | 71.2% | 89% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.7B HKD (≈$218M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 2 | 1.7B HKD (≈$223M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.4B BRL (≈$247M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 228 | 4.7B CNY (≈$657M) | 7 | 24 | |
| 228 | 1.7B CNY (≈$233M) | 7 | 12 | |
| 228 | 2.2B CNY (≈$308M) | 7 | 28 | |
| 228 | 3.9B CNY (≈$541M) | 7 | 15 | |
| 228 | 364M USD | 7 | 26 | |
| 234 | 597M USD | 5 | 22 | |
| 234 | 3.1B NOK (≈$298M) | 5 | 12 | |
| 234 | 11.0B TRY (≈$330M) | 5 | 25 | |
| 234 | 436M USD | 5 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score