Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGM · against 216 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #88 of 217 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score30 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MGM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | MGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 214 reported | 5.3% | 4.9% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 220 reported | 6.2% | 8.9% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 18.8% | 6.3% | 97% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 214 reported | 32.2% | 33.4% | 47% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 88 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 56 | 51 | |
| 88 | 32.4B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 56 | 73 | |
| 88 | 5.9B USD | 56 | 75 | |
| 88 | 6.6B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 88 | 7.9B USD | 56 | 31 | |
| 93 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 55 | 41 | |
| 93 | 8.2B AUD (≈$5.4B) | 55 | 58 | |
| 93 | 499.1B INR (≈$6.0B) | 55 | 69 | |
| 96 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 54 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score