Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGM · against 220 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #185 of 221 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score13 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including MGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | MGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 211 reported | 3.2% | 11.0% | 12% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 221 reported | 7.6% | 10.1% | 39% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 209 reported | 1.8% | 4.8% | 14% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 197 reported | 18.9% | 14.3% | 62% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 222 reported | 44.2% | 34.7% | 69% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 182 | 1.46T JPY (≈$9.9B) | 39 | 62 | |
| 182 | 15.2B USD | 39 | 57 | |
| 184 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 38 | 51 | |
| 185 | 8.6B USD | 37 | 49 | |
| 185 | 7.9B USD | 37 | 31 | |
| 187 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 35 | 64 | |
| 187 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 35 | 34 | |
| 189 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 34 | 41 | |
| 189 | 7.5B EUR (≈$8.2B) | 34 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score