Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MGE Energy, Inc.
How MGE Energy, Inc. stacks up
MGEE · against 89 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Growth
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #42 of 90 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MGEE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.3% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 10.4% vs peer median 1.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MGEE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MGEE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 9.9% | 7.4% | 67% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 10.4% | 2.8% | 63% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 89 reported | 1.3% | 4.0% | 27% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MGEE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 39 | 29.4B USD | 67 | 57 | |
| 39 | 36.3B USD | 67 | 51 | |
| 39 | 17.1B USD | 67 | 19 | |
| 42 | 30.6B USD | 66 | 47 | |
| 42 | 2.8B USD | 66 | 57 | |
| 44 | 349M USD | 65 | 60 | |
| 44 | 27.9B USD | 65 | 41 | |
| 44 | 27.3B USD | 65 | 39 | |
| 47 | 23.3B USD | 64 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score