Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MidCap Financial Investment Corporation
How MidCap Financial Investment Corporation stacks up
MFIC · against 131 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
87/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #17 of 132 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including MFIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 87?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.5% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 62.6% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MFIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MFIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | -3.4% | 4.8% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | Not reported | 6.9% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 62.6% | 5.6% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 129.8% | 63.8% | 84% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MFIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 13 | 157M USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 13 | 202M USD | 90 | 39 | |
| 16 | 370M USD | 89 | 85 | |
| 17 | 3.1B USD | 87 | 36 | |
| 17 | 848M USD | 87 | 36 | |
| 17 | 662M USD | 87 | 37 | |
| 17 | 352M USD | 87 | 62 | |
| 21 | 707M USD | 86 | 48 | |
| 22 | 910M USD | 85 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score