Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
META · against 505 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #264 of 506 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including META · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | META | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 466 reported | 0.43× | 0.40× | 48% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 1.24 | 0.60 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 496 reported | 2.23× | 1.38× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.4B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 87.1B JPY (≈$592M) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1.01T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.85T JPY (≈$12.6B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 56.1B JPY (≈$381M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 260 | 3.7B USD | 49 | 32 | |
| 261 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.3B USD |
| 49 |
| 24 |
| 262 | 52M AUD (≈$34M) | 48 | 25 |
| 263 | 22.7B USD | 48 | 61 |
| 264 | 1.84T USD | 48 | 66 |
| 265 | 822M USD | 48 | 49 |
| 266 | 458.7B IDR (≈$28M) | 48 | 45 |
| 267 | 3.8B NZD (≈$2.3B) | 47 | 70 |
| 268 | 182.5B TRY (≈$5.5B) | 47 | 76 |