Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
META · against 150 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #53 of 151 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including META · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | META | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 135 reported | 0.43× | 0.66× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 142 reported | 1.24 | 0.90 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 150 reported | 2.23× | 1.28× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 2 | 684M USD | 94 | 70 | |
| 3 | 468M USD | 93 | 67 | |
| 4 | 669M USD | 93 | 80 | |
| 5 | 292M USD | 91 | 34 | |
| 49 | 1.9B USD | 51 | 79 | |
| 50 | 3.7B USD | 49 | 32 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 51 |
| 1.3B USD |
| 49 |
| 24 |
| 52 | 22.7B USD | 48 | 61 |
| 53 | 1.84T USD | 48 | 66 |
| 54 | 822M USD | 48 | 49 |
| 55 | 4.5B USD | 47 | 59 |
| 56 | 22.1B USD | 45 | 54 |
| 56 | 23.9B USD | 45 | 52 |