Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MercadoLibre, Inc.
How MercadoLibre, Inc. stacks up
MELI · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #571 of 1,604 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score161 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including MELI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 8.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 78% of peers. Return on invested capital: 15.5% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MELI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MELI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 15.5% | 7.3% | 78% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 8.3% | 6.4% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 3.6% | 3.3% | 54% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 27.5% | 7.7% | 91% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 47.7% | 30.2% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MELI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 571 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 64 | 27 | |
| 571 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score