Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Marcus Corporation
How The Marcus Corporation stacks up
MCS · against 509 other Communication Services companies
Profitability
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #304 of 510 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score50 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including MCS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 66% of peers. Operating margin: 4.1% vs peer median 8.2%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 4.4% vs peer median 6.0%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.3% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MCS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 460 reported | 4.4% | 6.0% | 44% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 506 reported | 4.1% | 8.2% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | 2.3% | 2.7% | 46% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 475 reported | 5.0% | 5.4% | 49% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 513 reported | 41.6% | 46.2% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MCS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 3 | 18.2B JPY (≈$124M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 82.5B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 299 | 5.8B CNY (≈$817M) | 41 | 43 | |
| 299 | 1.8B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 41 | 42 | |
| 299 | 4.3B EUR (≈$4.7B) | 41 | 44 | |
| 304 | 8.1B JPY (≈$55M) | 40 | 35 | |
| 304 | 840M USD | 40 | 49 | |
| 304 | 2.4B DKK (≈$363M) | 40 | 60 | |
| 304 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 40 | 50 | |
| 304 | 7.8B AUD (≈$5.1B) | 40 | 32 | |
| 309 | 47.8B KRW (≈$34M) | 39 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score