Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MCD · against 20 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 21 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MCD · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | MCD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 22 reported | 5.3% | 5.0% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 21 reported | 6.9% | 6.9% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 14 reported | 4.8% | 4.3% | 54% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 17 reported | -0.6% | 8.3% | 25% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 111.7B USD | 97 | 91 | |
| 2 | 679.7B HKD (≈$87.0B) | 85 | 72 | |
| 3 | 76.1B EUR (≈$83.7B) | 73 | 59 | |
| 4 | 611.1B CNY (≈$85.6B) | 66 | 70 | |
| 5 | 1.08T BRL (≈$194.4B) | 64 | 51 | |
| 6 | 101.9B USD | 57 | 50 | |
| 7 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 191.5B EUR (≈$210.6B) |
| 54 |
| 54 |
| 8 | 117.1B USD | 48 | 55 |
| 9 | 285.1B USD | 44 | 46 |
| 10 | 163.4B USD | 42 | 50 |
| 11 | 216.6B USD | 36 | 40 |
| 12 | 166.2B EUR (≈$182.8B) | 34 | 57 |
| 13 | 152.7B USD | 33 | 62 |
| 14 | 94.9B USD | 32 | 51 |