Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MATX · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,821 of 2,437 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)243 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MATX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MATX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.26× | 0.41× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.30 | 0.61 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 0.89× | 1.62× | 10% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,817 | 15.4B USD | 25 | 54 | |
| 1,818 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 18.2B HKD (≈$2.3B) |
| 25 |
| 59 |
| 1,819 | 329M EUR (≈$362M) | 25 | 52 |
| 1,820 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 25 | 49 |
| 1,821 | 6.6B USD | 25 | 52 |
| 1,822 | 1.1B USD | 25 | 39 |
| 1,823 | 9.3B NOK (≈$888M) | 25 | 49 |
| 1,824 | 5.41T KRW (≈$3.9B) | 25 | 17 |
| 1,825 | 5.8B CNY (≈$808M) | 25 | 19 |