Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Masco Corporation
How Masco Corporation stacks up
MAS · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
61/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #112 of 473 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 5.3% | 3.0% | 81% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 7.8% | 6.3% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 6.9% | 3.3% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | -2.3% | 32.3% | 5% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 109 | 3.2B USD | 62 | 60 | |
| 109 | 5.2B USD | 62 | 44 | |
| 112 | 3.7B USD | 61 | 64 | |
| 112 | 7.4B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 112 | 16.2B USD | 61 | 49 | |
| 112 | 643M USD | 61 | 59 | |
| 112 | 15.8B USD | 61 | 45 | |
| 117 | 6.9B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 117 | 5.7B USD | 60 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score