Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Manhattan Associates, Inc.
How Manhattan Associates, Inc. stacks up
MANH · against 182 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #133 of 183 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including MANH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MANH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MANH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 185 reported | 6.5% | 16.2% | 22% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 157 reported | -1.4% | 18.8% | 25% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 181 reported | 9.9% | 10.5% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MANH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 129 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 50 | 47 | |
| 129 | 1.74T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 50 | 64 | |
| 129 | 18.8B USD | 50 | 64 | |
| 129 | 20.2B USD | 50 | 50 | |
| 133 | 14.9B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 133 | 17.8B USD | 48 | 25 | |
| 135 | 16.8B USD | 47 | 66 | |
| 136 | 28.4B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 136 | 15.6B USD | 46 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score