Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ManpowerGroup Inc.
How ManpowerGroup Inc. stacks up
MAN · against 664 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #248 of 665 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score76 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.6% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MAN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 663 reported | 4.9% | 4.6% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 674 reported | 12.3% | 8.0% | 76% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 3.3% | 4.6% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 664 reported | 99.6% | 51.4% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MAN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 248 | 3.1B USD | 67 | 51 | |
| 248 | 1.8B CHF (≈$2.1B) | 67 | 63 | |
| 248 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 50 | |
| 248 | 10.3B DKK (≈$1.6B) | 67 | 35 | |
| 248 | 2.1B USD | 67 | 52 | |
| 253 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 66 | 67 | |
| 253 | 176.5B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 66 | 65 | |
| 253 | 23.6B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 66 | 61 | |
| 253 | 261.9B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 66 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score