Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MAIR · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,474 of 2,437 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including MAIR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MAIR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.87× | 0.41× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | Not reported | 0.61 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 1.82× | 1.62× | 59% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,470 | 10.3B DKK (≈$1.6B) | 40 | 35 | |
| 1,471 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) |
| 40 |
| 46 |
| 1,472 | 297.1B SEK (≈$29.7B) | 40 | 53 |
| 1,473 | 83.5B CNY (≈$11.7B) | 40 | 55 |
| 1,474 | 12.5B USD | 40 | 59 |
| 1,475 | 370M EUR (≈$408M) | 39 | 41 |
| 1,476 | 6.8B GBP (≈$8.9B) | 39 | 47 |
| 1,477 | 10.0B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 39 | 49 |
| 1,478 | 1.07T JPY (≈$7.3B) | 39 | 57 |