Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Macerich Company
How The Macerich Company stacks up
MAC · against 123 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #80 of 124 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 125 reported | 1.3% | 6.3% | 24% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 107 reported | Not reported | 12.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 122 reported | 5.1% | 7.4% | 44% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 76 | 83.6B SEK (≈$8.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 77 | 19.0B SAR (≈$5.1B) | 54 | 61 | |
| 78 | 3.8B USD | 53 | 55 | |
| 78 | 5.3B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 80 | 7.3B USD | 52 | 23 | |
| 81 | 7.9B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 82 | 682.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 82 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 84 | 10.8B CAD (≈$7.9B) | 49 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score