Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
How Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. stacks up
MAA · against 76 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
33/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #71 of 77 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including MAA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -28.8% vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MAA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MAA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 0.8% | 5.4% | 16% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 64 reported | -28.8% | 14.7% | 5% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 1.6% | 6.2% | 12% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MAA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 67 | 94.4B HKD (≈$12.1B) | 38 | 52 | |
| 68 | 11.79T KRW (≈$8.5B) | 36 | 32 | |
| 68 | 8.8B USD | 36 | 28 | |
| 70 | 18.3B USD | 34 | 38 | |
| 71 | 14.0B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 72 | 7.1B CHF (≈$8.2B) | 32 | 40 | |
| 73 | 14.6B USD | 25 | 28 | |
| 74 | 13.8B EUR (≈$15.2B) | 23 | 36 | |
| 75 | 10.6B CHF (≈$12.2B) | 21 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score