Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LYTS · against 609 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #371 of 610 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)50 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including LYTS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LYTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 581 reported | 0.85× | 0.22× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 586 reported | 0.48 | 0.67 | 69% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 607 reported | 1.97× | 1.83× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 5 | 3.8B CNY (≈$530M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 367 | 937M USD | 44 | 74 | |
| 368 | 5.4B ILS (≈$1.5B) | 44 | 63 | |
| 369 | 665M NZD (≈$399M) | 44 | 37 | |
| 370 | 1.4B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 371 | 785M USD | 44 | 51 | |
| 372 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 44 | 38 | |
| 373 | 2.3B AUD (≈$1.5B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 374 | 63.0B JPY (≈$429M) | 43 | 66 | |
| 375 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 43 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score