Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
How LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. stacks up
LX · against 21 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #8 of 22 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including LX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: -7.4% vs peer median 7.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 10.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 45.7% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 22 reported | -7.4% | -7.5% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 16 reported | 45.7% | 9.7% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 20 reported | 10.1% | 5.9% | 63% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 956M HKD (≈$122M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 2 | 773M HKD (≈$99M) | 81 | 61 | |
| 2 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 81 | 66 | |
| 4 | 4.5B THB (≈$127M) | 79 | 68 | |
| 5 | 190M USD | 74 | 67 | |
| 6 | 82M USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 7 | 11.1B JPY (≈$76M) | 57 | 63 | |
| 8 | 113M USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 9 | 6.5B THB (≈$182M) | 48 | 56 | |
| 10 | 294M CAD (≈$215M) | 41 | 49 | |
| 11 | 221M CAD (≈$161M) | 39 | ||
| 12 | 412M MYR (≈$91M) | 37 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score