Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LWAY · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #299 of 802 · scores higher than 63% of peers · safety percentile 63
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including LWAY · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LWAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.27× | 0.44× | 61% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.47 | 0.32 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.09× | 1.53× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 295 | 355.7B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 63 | 70 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 296 |
| 53.2B THB (≈$1.5B) |
| 63 |
| 68 |
| 297 | 5.1B CNY (≈$709M) | 63 | 16 |
| 298 | 3.0B USD | 63 | 63 |
| 299 | 336M USD | 63 | 63 |
| 300 | 83.2B TRY (≈$2.5B) | 63 | 25 |
| 301 | 3.3B THB (≈$91M) | 63 | 40 |
| 302 | 8.59T IDR (≈$533M) | 62 | 69 |
| 303 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 62 | 55 |