Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LVWR · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,425 of 1,553 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score148 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including LVWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | LVWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | -59.8% | 4.4% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -38.6% | 8.8% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | -41.2% | 6.1% | 2% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | -4.5% | 57.2% | 3% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,425 | 9.5B TRY (≈$284M) | 6 | 18 | |
| 1,425 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.2B USD |
| 6 |
| 25 |
| 1,425 | 188M USD | 6 | 17 |
| 1,425 | 1.4B USD | 6 | 41 |
| 1,425 | 124M USD | 6 | 23 |
| 1,425 | 8.0B USD | 6 | 26 |
| 1,425 | 322M USD | 6 | 23 |
| 1,425 | 36.1B TRY (≈$1.1B) | 6 | 30 |
| 1,425 | 19.2B USD | 6 | 29 |