Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LVWR · against 142 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #126 of 143 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score22 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including LVWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | LVWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | -59.8% | 4.2% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | -38.6% | 10.9% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 67 reported | -41.2% | 10.7% | 5% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 135 reported | -4.5% | 121.2% | 2% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 104.2B KRW (≈$75M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1.1B HKD (≈$137M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 545M HKD (≈$70M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 126 | 1.9B HKD (≈$238M) | 6 | 50 | |
| 126 | 511M SAR (≈$138M) | 6 | 32 | |
| 126 | 521M MYR (≈$115M) | 6 | 31 | |
| 126 | 188M USD | 6 | 17 | |
| 126 | 124M USD | 6 | 23 | |
| 126 | 4.1B TRY (≈$123M) | 6 | 6 | |
| 126 | 237M USD | 6 | 35 | |
| 133 | 241M AUD (≈$159M) | 5 | 25 | |
| 133 | 1.4B MXN (≈$78M) | 5 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score