Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LULU · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #636 of 1,585 · scores higher than 60% of peers · safety percentile 60
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including LULU · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LULU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.45× | 0.50× | 53% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.86 | 0.56 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 2.19× | 1.48× | 74% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 632 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 60 | 39 | |
| 633 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 53.4B JPY (≈$363M) |
| 60 |
| 54 |
| 634 | 15.4B USD | 60 | 74 |
| 635 | 9.8B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 60 | 45 |
| 636 | 11.8B USD | 60 | 73 |
| 637 | 352.7B INR (≈$4.2B) | 60 | 61 |
| 638 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 60 | 61 |
| 639 | 2.6B CNY (≈$369M) | 60 | 21 |
| 640 | 4.1B USD | 60 | 34 |