Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LULU · against 159 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #51 of 160 · scores higher than 69% of peers · safety percentile 60
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including LULU · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LULU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 157 reported | 0.45× | 0.71× | 61% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 160 reported | 0.86 | 0.90 | 53% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 156 reported | 2.19× | 1.47× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 47 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 65 | 67 | |
| 48 | 7.0B USD | 63 | 59 | |
| 49 | 137.5B HKD (≈$17.6B) | 62 | 77 | |
| 50 | 15.4B USD | 60 | 74 | |
| 51 | 11.8B USD | 60 | 73 | |
| 52 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 60 | 61 | |
| 53 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 58 | 79 | |
| 54 | 12.2B EUR (≈$13.4B) | 58 | 60 | |
| 55 | 6.2B USD | 57 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score