Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to lululemon athletica inc.
How lululemon athletica inc. stacks up
LULU · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #233 of 356 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including LULU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -14.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LULU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LULU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 1.7% | 5.9% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -14.7% | 6.2% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 7.9% | 4.1% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LULU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 231 | 5.4B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 231 | 4.7B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 233 | 2.1B USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 233 | 119.7B USD | 44 | 48 | |
| 233 | 11.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 233 | 10.2B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 237 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 238 | 332.9B USD | 42 | 45 | |
| 238 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score