Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation
How Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation stacks up
LUCK · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #939 of 1,604 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including LUCK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on assets: -1.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 8.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 71% of peers. Operating margin: 11.0% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LUCK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LUCK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 8.0% | 7.3% | 53% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 11.0% | 6.4% | 71% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | -1.1% | 3.3% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 35.1% | 30.2% | 58% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LUCKScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score