Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation
How Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation stacks up
LUCK · against 630 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #332 of 631 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including LUCK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on assets: -1.1% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 8.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 71% of peers. Operating margin: 11.0% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LUCK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LUCK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 604 reported | 8.0% | 6.3% | 61% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 630 reported | 11.0% | 5.7% | 76% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 596 reported | -1.1% | 2.6% | 14% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 584 reported | Not reported | 5.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 632 reported | 35.1% | 28.7% | 62% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LUCK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 2 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 2 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 4 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 4 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 332 | 54.7B JPY (≈$372M) | 41 | 57 | |
| 332 | 49.7B JPY (≈$338M) | 41 | 62 | |
| 332 | 62.2B JPY (≈$423M) | 41 | 40 | |
| 332 | 123.4B JPY (≈$839M) | 41 | 64 | |
| 332 | 571M USD | 41 | 30 | |
| 341 | 6.3B CNY (≈$882M) | 40 | 60 | |
| 341 | 122.2B JPY (≈$831M) | 40 | 54 | |
| 341 | 82.5B JPY (≈$561M) | 40 | 66 | |
| 341 | 326M USD | 40 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score