Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
How Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. stacks up
LTH · against 179 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #127 of 180 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score24 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LTH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 177 reported | 4.1% | 5.0% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 6.1% | 8.6% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 99 reported | -1.5% | 5.8% | 9% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 178 reported | 33.2% | 32.1% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LTH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 122 | 7.6B USD | 39 | 21 | |
| 125 | 194.5B THB (≈$5.4B) | 38 | 29 | |
| 125 | 5.5B USD | 38 | 36 | |
| 127 | 13.0B USD | 37 | 68 | |
| 127 | 10.0B USD | 37 | 55 | |
| 129 | 75.5B CNY (≈$10.6B) | 36 | 56 | |
| 129 | 8.6B GBP (≈$11.1B) | 36 | 45 | |
| 131 | 13.8B USD | 35 | 70 | |
| 131 | 5.9B USD | 35 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score