Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LTC Properties, Inc.
How LTC Properties, Inc. stacks up
LTC · against 175 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 176 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including LTC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.2% vs peer median 5.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.7% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LTC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LTC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 186 reported | 6.1% | 5.4% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 173 reported | 4.0% | 5.4% | 22% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | 5.7% | 7.2% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 188 reported | 51.4% | 104.4% | 12% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LTC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 1 | 213.1B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 3 | 13.2B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 96 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 5 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 95 | 80 | |
| 43 | 1.5B USD | 71 | 35 | |
| 45 | 1.3B USD | 70 | 47 | |
| 46 | 1.5B USD | 68 | 47 | |
| 46 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 68 | 79 | |
| 48 | 2.5B USD | 67 | 88 | |
| 49 | 1.8B USD | 66 | 69 | |
| 49 | 3.5B USD | 66 | 59 | |
| 51 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 49 | |
| 51 | 1.5B USD | 65 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score