Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HIW · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #223 of 663 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score67 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HIW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | HIW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 4.9% | 5.3% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 6.8% | 5.3% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 10.9% | 6.8% | 70% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 69.6% | 112.8% | 26% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 223 | 7.4B USD | 66 | 46 | |
| 223 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) |
| 66 |
| 62 |
| 223 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 66 | 48 |
| 223 | 1.8B USD | 66 | 69 |
| 223 | 3.5B USD | 66 | 59 |
| 223 | 536M USD | 66 | 27 |
| 223 | 816M EUR (≈$898M) | 66 | 56 |
| 230 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.6B) | 65 | 58 |
| 230 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 49 |