Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lightbridge Corporation
How Lightbridge Corporation stacks up
LTBR · against 275 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
16/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #186 of 276 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including LTBR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -16.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -10.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LTBR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LTBR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 268 reported | -16.3% | 1.7% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 287 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | -10.1% | 2.1% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 276 reported | 141.9% | 72.1% | 76% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LTBR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$174M) | 99 | 53 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$221M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1.3B HKD (≈$164M) | 99 | 58 | |
| 184 | 184M EUR (≈$202M) | 17 | 13 | |
| 184 | 332M USD | 17 | 41 | |
| 186 | 2.1B CNY (≈$294M) | 16 | 25 | |
| 186 | 96M USD | 16 | 23 | |
| 186 | 168M USD | 16 | 37 | |
| 186 | 209M USD | 16 | 46 | |
| 186 | 226M USD | 16 | 49 | |
| 191 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 15 | 23 | |
| 191 | 1.5B CNY (≈$214M) | 15 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score