Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Landstar System, Inc.
How Landstar System, Inc. stacks up
LSTR · against 452 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #350 of 453 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LSTR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LSTR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LSTR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | 2.6% | 4.3% | 23% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 457 reported | 5.0% | 7.8% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 193 reported | 3.4% | 4.1% | 44% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | 16.3% | 40.3% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LSTR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 344 | 4.0B GBP (≈$5.2B) | 36 | 63 | |
| 349 | 25.2B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 35 | 28 | |
| 350 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 34 | 50 | |
| 350 | 3.6B USD | 34 | 51 | |
| 350 | 5.1B USD | 34 | 49 | |
| 350 | 720.1B INR (≈$8.6B) | 34 | 62 | |
| 350 | 57.7B SEK (≈$5.8B) | 34 | 69 | |
| 355 | 105.3B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 33 | 37 | |
| 355 | 382.7B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 33 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score