Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
How Lattice Semiconductor Corporation stacks up
LSCC · against 183 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
21/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #168 of 184 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including LSCC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 72% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.2% vs peer median 2.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.3% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LSCC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LSCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 0.2% | 2.9% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 0.6% | 4.8% | 9% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 114 reported | 1.1% | 3.3% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 5.4% | 18.4% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LSCC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 66.7B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 2 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 256.0B TWD (≈$7.9B) | 93 | 70 | |
| 165 | 17.07T KRW (≈$12.3B) | 23 | 62 | |
| 165 | 7.9B USD | 23 | 16 | |
| 167 | 888.4B TWD (≈$27.5B) | 22 | 73 | |
| 168 | 89.1B CNY (≈$12.5B) | 21 | 20 | |
| 168 | 15.0B USD | 21 | 47 | |
| 168 | 27.0B USD | 21 | 55 | |
| 171 | 910.6B TWD (≈$28.2B) | 20 | 56 | |
| 171 | 8.7B USD | 20 | 43 | |
| 173 | 11.2B USD | 19 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score