Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Liquidity Services, Inc.
How Liquidity Services, Inc. stacks up
LQDT · against 487 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #134 of 488 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score49 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including LQDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 24.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 16.5% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LQDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LQDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 488 reported | 5.2% | 3.8% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 375 reported | 24.4% | 4.7% | 70% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 485 reported | 16.5% | 4.8% | 84% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LQDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 87 | |
| 2 | 154.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 134 | 45.3B TRY (≈$1.4B) | 74 | 30 | |
| 134 | 77.2B THB (≈$2.2B) | 74 | 64 | |
| 134 | 93.7B INR (≈$1.1B) | 74 | 61 | |
| 134 | 2.1B USD | 74 | 40 | |
| 134 | 1.4B USD | 74 | 62 | |
| 134 | 1.0B USD | 74 | 60 | |
| 142 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 73 | 35 | |
| 142 | 2.7B USD | 73 | 53 | |
| 142 | 718M GBP (≈$934M) | 73 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score