Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LQDA · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,016 of 1,373 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 26
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including LQDA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LQDA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.94× | 0.24× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.54 | 0.53 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 2.31× | 2.62× | 46% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,012 | 13.9B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 26 | 29 | |
| 1,013 | 3.2B CHF (≈$3.6B) | 26 | 54 | |
| 1,014 | 9.7B SEK (≈$965M) | 26 | 45 | |
| 1,015 | 1.5B USD | 26 | 63 | |
| 1,016 | 3.8B USD | 26 | 71 | |
| 1,017 | 736M HKD (≈$94M) | 26 | 24 | |
| 1,018 | 18.5B USD | 26 | 62 | |
| 1,019 | 28.7B USD | 26 | 52 | |
| 1,020 | 399M USD | 26 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score