Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LQDA · against 274 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #211 of 275 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 26
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)26 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including LQDA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LQDA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 271 reported | 0.94× | 0.25× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 270 reported | 0.54 | 0.55 | 52% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 263 reported | 2.31× | 2.44× | 47% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 2.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 207 | 9.7B AUD (≈$6.4B) | 27 | 52 | |
| 208 | 7.2B USD | 26 | 43 | |
| 209 | 13.9B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 26 | 29 | |
| 210 | 3.2B CHF (≈$3.6B) | 26 | 54 | |
| 211 | 3.8B USD | 26 | 71 | |
| 212 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 26 | 47 | |
| 213 | 2.4B CHF (≈$2.7B) | 25 | 59 | |
| 214 | 2.0B USD | 25 | 26 | |
| 215 | 73.5B TRY (≈$2.2B) | 24 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score