Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
How Louisiana-Pacific Corporation stacks up
LPX · against 455 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #397 of 456 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including LPX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.2% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LPX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LPX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 1.0% | 4.3% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 460 reported | 4.8% | 7.8% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 197 reported | -0.4% | 4.1% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 33.8% | 40.3% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LPX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 394 | 3.2B USD | 25 | 22 | |
| 394 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 25 | 56 | |
| 397 | 60.3B CNY (≈$8.4B) | 24 | 48 | |
| 397 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 24 | 73 | |
| 397 | 5.2B USD | 24 | 28 | |
| 397 | 4.4B USD | 24 | 56 | |
| 401 | 65.0B CNY (≈$9.1B) | 23 | 37 | |
| 401 | 3.9B USD | 23 | 20 | |
| 401 | 316.0B INR (≈$3.8B) | 23 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score